Rhonda Hall has spent her life and career in Accomack County on Virginia’s Eastern Shore.
Her career there began 36 years ago, when she took a job as a second grade teacher at North Accomack Elementary School. From there, she became assistant principal, principal and assistant superintendent.
In June 2023, she was awarded the school district’s top job of superintendent, making her the first woman and first Black person to hold the position. It seemed like a dream come true. But just 15 months later, the Accomack County School Board abruptly fired her in a 5-4 vote.
Three months later, Hall said, she still doesn’t know why.
“All I was told was that they wanted to go in a different direction,” she said. “Why didn’t they come to me and say ‘We want to go in a different direction.’”
Last week, the school board agreed to settle a lawsuit that alleged the panel violated several provisions of the state’s Freedom of Information Act when it hastily scheduled the Oct. 23 meeting to fire Hall. The lawsuit was filed in December by a local teacher and three county residents who opposed Hall’s firing and the way it was handled. The claim was filed by Virginia Beach attorney Kevin Martingayle, who also represents Hall.
Rhonda Hall became the first woman and first Black person to serve as Accomack County’s schools superintendent when she got the job in June 2023. The school board fired her 15 months later in a 5-4 vote.
The lawsuit said the board didn’t provide three days notice for the meeting, failed to list an address for it and held it in a conference room that wasn’t big enough for members of the public to attend. The board’s notice also stated it was a “closed special meeting,” even though parts of it were open. The lawsuit alleges Hall’s firing should be ruled void because the meeting when it happened was illegally held.
In its settlement, the board acknowledged it violated the FOIA law, but contended the infractions were not intended. The panel also promised to follow the rules in the future, and agreed to pay the group’s attorney’s fees.
A lawyer for the board didn’t respond to a message seeking comment. School Board Chairwoman Janet Martin Turner also didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.
“When you’re elected, you’re required to become familiar with FOIA,” Martingayle said. “It’s a violation of the law if you don’t do that.”
Over the last year, there has been a “political shift” on the board, Martingayle said, with votes typically ending in the same 5-4 result. The lawyer said he believes the board members who wanted Hall out hastily scheduled the meeting, and kept the notice about it vague because they wanted to avoid backlash.
“Dr. Hall is a popular figure in Accomack,” Martingayle said. “I think they didn’t want to have to deal with the blowback they would have gotten if the public knew about it.”
An online petition seeking Hall’s reinstatement has gathered more than 400 signatures, and petitions seeking a recall of Martin Turner’s position on the board also have been submitted. Hall hopes to resolve the issue of her firing out of court, but will sue if that doesn’t happen, Martingayle said.
In a statement released after Hall’s termination, Martin Turner said the decision was made “following a thorough review and consideration of various factors related to the leadership of our school district. We recognize the importance of an effective leadership team in fostering a positive educational environment for our students and staff. We believe it is in the best interest of the district to move forward with new leadership that aligns with our vision and goals.”
The firing came just weeks after the county’s sheriff complained to state officials that Hall failed to cooperate with his department’s investigation into an alleged school violence threat. He said the superintendent told him he had to get a search warrant and make a request in writing to obtain the age, address, and parent names of students his office had requested.
Lisa Coons, the state superintendent of public instruction, wrote a letter to Hallchastising her for her lack of cooperation, and the potential harm it could have caused.
Hall, however, claims that school officials had already investigated and determined it was a misunderstanding based on rumors. She wrote in a letter to a local newspaper that the incident started with an argument between two girls at a football game. A student who heard the argument made a comment that the brother of one of the girls was in a gang and might come and shoot up the school, Hall wrote. One of the girls made the same statement to another student, who then told his mother. The mother then reported it to a teacher.
Hall said all the people involved were interviewed, and it was determined that there was no threat.
In an interview Thursday, Hall said student safety always has been a top priority for her. She had metal detectors installed in all the schools, where bags of everyone entering the building also are checked. She also implemented a policy that requires two school security officers to be at each school, with one stationed at the front entrance of the building throughout the day.
Hall said she didn’t know the board was considering firing her until a few hours before the meeting. She also didn’t know that some members were unhappy with her performance.
“This was totally political,” she said. “I did nothing wrong.”
Jane Harper, jane.harper@pilotonline.com
